When D4vd, the rising R&B artist whose real name is David, was quietly added to a homicide investigation in November 2025, few expected the name to appear alongside a 15-year-old girl’s tragic story. But that’s exactly what happened: Celeste Rivas Hernandez, who vanished from her home in Lake Elsinore, California, in April 2024, is now believed to be dead — and LAPD detectives are treating D4vd as a suspect. The confirmation came not from an official press release — none has been issued — but from KTLA 5 reporter Mary Beth McDade, citing multiple law enforcement sources on November 19, 2025. The shift from missing person to homicide after 19 months is chilling. And the details? Even more so.
From Missing to Murder: A Year-Long Silence
Celeste Rivas Hernandez was 15 when she left her home in Lake Elsinore, a quiet city in Riverside County, in April 2024. Her family reported her missing the same day. No signs of struggle. No note. Just gone. For over a year, the case languished in the backlog of juvenile missing persons — a reality too common in California’s sprawling suburbs. But in late 2025, something changed. Investigators found evidence pointing to foul play. The case was reclassified as a homicide. The timing? Coinciding with a mysterious late-night trip made by D4vd in the spring of 2025.The Santa Barbara Connection
According to reports from KTLA and TMZ, D4vd drove alone to a remote stretch of Santa Barbara County in March or April 2025 — just weeks after Celeste was last seen. He stayed there for several hours, arriving after midnight and leaving before dawn. No public records show why he went. No social media posts. No hotel receipts. Just a GPS ping and a single witness — a park ranger who recalled seeing a lone vehicle parked near a secluded ridge, its engine off, lights dark. "It was unusual," the ranger told investigators. "No hikers. No campers. Just… silence." Now, that ridge is being treated as a potential burial site. Forensic teams have begun ground-penetrating radar scans. The area is dense with chaparral, rocky, and rarely visited — perfect for someone who wanted to disappear something. And according to McDade’s sources, D4vd didn’t act alone. "New reports are surfacing that the singer may have had help disposing of her body," she reported. Who? No names yet. But investigators are now interviewing people connected to D4vd’s tour crew, social circle, and even fans who claim to have driven him that night.
Who Is D4vd? The Rise of a Quiet Star
D4vd, born David, rose to fame in 2023 with moody, emotionally raw R&B tracks that resonated with Gen Z listeners. He doesn’t do interviews. He avoids red carpets. His Instagram has fewer than 50 posts, mostly song snippets and cryptic captions. He’s not the type you’d expect to be linked to a homicide. But that’s part of what makes this case so unsettling. He’s not a flashy celebrity. He’s a ghost in plain sight. His music? Often about isolation, loss, and being unseen. One fan on Reddit wrote: "He sings like someone who’s already buried something." Authorities haven’t released any direct evidence tying him to Celeste — no DNA, no digital communications, no surveillance footage. But the circumstantial trail is growing. The timing. The location. The secrecy. And now, the possibility of accomplices.Why This Matters Beyond the Headlines
Celeste Rivas Hernandez wasn’t just a missing teen. She was a child who ran away — likely fleeing abuse, neglect, or trauma. Her case, like so many others, was deprioritized. That’s the ugly truth. In California, over 1,200 minors go missing each year. Less than 10% are classified as potential homicides within the first six months. Celeste’s case took 19 months. That delay may have cost her family closure. It may have allowed evidence to vanish. Now, the LAPD’s homicide division is under pressure. If D4vd is charged, it will be one of the first times a rising music star is implicated in the death of a runaway teen with no prior criminal record. The case could force reforms in how missing minors are handled — especially those who disappear without obvious signs of abduction.
What’s Next?
The investigation is far from over. Forensic teams are still analyzing soil samples from the Santa Barbara site. Phone records from D4vd’s devices during that night are being subpoenaed. Investigators are also reviewing his private social media accounts — encrypted, but not unbreakable. A grand jury could be convened as early as January 2026. No arrest has been made. No warrant publicly filed. But sources say detectives are preparing for a possible indictment. Meanwhile, Celeste’s family remains silent. They’ve hired a private investigator and refuse to speak to the media. Their lawyer issued a single statement in November: "We are praying for justice — not for fame, not for headlines. For her." The twist? D4vd hasn’t responded. No social media post. No denial. No statement. He’s still recording music. Still performing. Still… invisible.Frequently Asked Questions
How did LAPD connect D4vd to Celeste Rivas Hernandez’s death?
LAPD hasn’t released direct evidence, but investigators are focused on D4vd’s unexplained late-night trip to a remote area of Santa Barbara County in spring 2025 — just weeks after Celeste vanished. His vehicle’s GPS data, witness accounts from a park ranger, and the timing of his whereabouts align with the estimated window of when her body may have been disposed of. The lack of any alibi or explanation has raised serious red flags.
Why was the case reclassified as a homicide after over a year?
The reclassification came after new forensic leads emerged — likely from digital footprints or witness testimony that surfaced in late 2025. Authorities often delay reclassifying missing persons cases unless there’s concrete evidence of foul play. In Celeste’s case, the combination of D4vd’s suspicious movements and the absence of any credible sightings after April 2024 prompted detectives to treat it as a homicide, triggering a full forensic investigation.
Could D4vd be charged even without finding Celeste’s body?
Yes. California law allows homicide charges based on circumstantial evidence — even without a body. Prosecutors have successfully secured convictions in similar cases, like the 2019 trial of a musician in San Diego accused of killing his girlfriend after her remains were never found. If investigators can prove D4vd caused Celeste’s death and concealed it, they don’t need the body to move forward.
What role did the public and media play in advancing this case?
KTLA and TMZ’s reporting brought renewed attention to a case that had faded from public view. Their coverage likely pressured LAPD to prioritize the investigation. Celeste’s family had been ignored for over a year. Once the media spotlight returned, law enforcement had to act — especially with a celebrity suspect involved. Public pressure often accelerates cold cases, particularly when minors are involved.
Is there a risk this case could be dismissed due to lack of evidence?
There’s always risk in circumstantial cases. But LAPD’s focus on forensic analysis of the Santa Barbara site, combined with potential accomplice testimony, strengthens their position. California has no statute of limitations for homicide, so even if charges aren’t filed immediately, the case remains open indefinitely. Authorities have said they’re committed to pursuing every lead — no matter how long it takes.
What does this mean for other missing teens in California?
This case highlights how quickly missing minors — especially those who run away — are deprioritized. Celeste’s story may become a catalyst for policy change, pushing departments to assign dedicated investigators to runaway cases within 72 hours, not months. Advocacy groups are already calling for statewide reforms, arguing that every missing child deserves immediate attention — regardless of their background or whether they chose to leave home.
Write a comment